Two fatal leadership flexibility mistakes in journey management, and how to avoid them

Managing customer journeys isn't just about smooth operations or seamless user experiences—it's about avoiding two major pitfalls that can derail everything: being too prescriptive with teams and arbitrarily assigning leadership. These mistakes stem from a common belief that tighter central control results in better outcomes. In reality, this stifles creativity and ownership, leading to inefficiency and dissatisfaction. The key takeaway? JourneyOps managers should prioritize clear goals, giving teams the freedom to chart their own course, and allow leadership to emerge naturally.

Why it matters

Micromanaging and handing out leadership titles crush initiative and lead to disengagement.

The problem with being too prescriptive

One of the biggest blunders in journey management is over-specifying how work should be done. Companies often get trapped in dictating the minutiae: who handles which process, what tools to use, and who gets the final say. The logic is that this will streamline operations—but it does the opposite. By telling teams exactly how to work, companies strip away their autonomy, which is critical for innovation and problem-solving.

Effective JourneyOps managers set clear, measurable goals, but avoid prescribing the methods. Teams that have the freedom to figure out how to achieve those goals end up with better outcomes. Micromanagement, on the other hand, leaves teams frustrated, disempowered, and stuck in a rigid blueprint that doesn’t suit their style or needs.

The illusion of assigning leadership

Another common misstep is assuming leadership can be assigned like a task. In journey management, leadership isn’t a job title—it's something that’s earned through understanding the journey, delivering results, and winning the trust of the team. When leadership is imposed on someone who hasn’t earned it, or worse, assigned to the wrong person, failure is almost guaranteed.

A better approach? Take a step back and observe. Who’s already leading in practice? Who does the team trust? Once you’ve identified those natural leaders, then formalize their role. This way, leadership emerges organically, grounded in real authority, rather than being arbitrarily assigned.

Why the data backs flexibility

Research consistently shows that flexible management practices outperform rigid, top-down approaches. A Gallup study found that highly engaged workplaces—where employees have autonomy—are 21% more profitable. Meanwhile, McKinsey research highlights that digital transformations are most successful when led by individuals already immersed in the process, rather than outsiders parachuted in.

These numbers drive home the point: rigid, prescriptive approaches don't work in journey management. Autonomy and earned leadership are the keys to unlocking the best results.

Key takeaways

• Stop micromanaging. Set the goal and let teams figure out the path.

• Leadership can’t be assigned arbitrarily—observe who is already leading the journey.

• Listen to your teams instead of imposing rigid processes.

• Autonomy fosters innovation and better results.

• Leadership and ownership must be earned, not imposed.

Further reading

• Gallup, Employee engagement drives business outcomes

• McKinsey & Company, Leading successful digital transformations

• Forrester, JourneyOps: Listening to teams and driving success

• Deloitte, How autonomy in the workplace boosts performance

• Harvard Business Review, The new dynamics of leadership in journey management

---

SUMMARY PROTOCOL
Topic: Two fatal mistakes in journey management and how to avoid them
Problem: Being too prescriptive with teams and arbitrarily assigning leadership.
Quick takeaway: Over-prescribing work methods and imposing leadership stifles creativity, disengages teams, and limits innovation.
Core content: Too much control over processes kills autonomy, creativity, and team problem-solving abilities. Arbitrarily assigning leadership results in failure and lacks team trust. Leadership should emerge naturally from those who demonstrate competence and gain respect. Flexibility and clear objectives outperform rigid management—research shows autonomy improves performance by 21% and digital transformations thrive when led by insiders.
Political landscape: Over-centralizing control risks internal dissent, disengagement, and loss of innovation-driven competitiveness.
Quick action: Set clear objectives and empower teams to define their paths. Observe and promote natural leaders.
Risk of doing nothing: Continuing rigid management practices will lead to disengaged teams, stifled innovation, and reduced performance.
Future protocol: Build a culture of autonomy where goals are clear, processes flexible, and leadership arises naturally from demonstrated ability.
Mission complete: Deploy autonomy, unlock innovation, watch productivity soar. 🚀